![]() ![]() More seriously, this is a long standing and widespread issue and I think it’s deceptive of WD to market the device as being Time Machine compatible yet say it is Apple’s problem when it doesn’t work. (If performing the mirroring setup for the first time, both Apollo units have to be on the same local area network. 2.Use Apollo Mirror function to mirror the 1st to the 2nd one at remote site. In sum, the recommended steps are: 1.Backup All Mac via Time Machine Backups to the 1st Apollo. If somebody could explain to me how to write an automated script to do this, I’d be very happy The mutual sync on both Apollo is not supported yet. I do this each time I want to make sure the backup is completed or if I need to do a restore. This is perhaps less drastic than a factory setting restore. I have found that if I reboot the M圜loud device from the Dashboard (Utilities > Device Maintenance > Reboot) and then run a backup, at least that initial backup runs at the expected speed with a transfer rate in the Mbs/sec. I too suffer from the excruciatingly slow backups with Time Machine where typically the transfer rate is in the low kb/sec. I’m using a WD M圜loud 3 TB device attached to my gigabit network and a couple of 27" iMacs - one late 2009 running Mavericks and the other late 2015 running El Capitan. I recoonected the My Book Studio and all running smoothly Odviosly simple text files copy faster unlike compressed jpeg or mp3 or video files. It is now completing the initial bachup at approx 1.3GB per minute which is not too bad. Here is what I did… first I dissconnected the My Book Studio thenĢ.Performed a system restore on the My Cloud drive (this just restores the disk system files to factory settings but does not delete any data files.ĭeleted the TimeMachine preference file in Library/Preferences/Ħ.Logged into the My Cloud, set up user accountħ.Opened TimeMachine from System Preferences, turned on backup, selected the My Cloud as the backup disk, logged in as guest, set what items I did not want including in the backup (mainly Applications) and started the back up. It has a fixed fee, unlike Time Machine, so it will be more expensive in the long run. The drawbacks of iCloud are pretty surface level. Time Machine offers a more flexible, hands-on approach, while iCloud is a simple, set-and-forget data solution. I also had another WD drive, a My Book Studio, attached to the router and I am now convinced it was part of the problem and causing confusion. The truth is that, at this point, both are extremely solid ways of keeping your data safe. I had a similar problem with a new My Cloud 2TB drive and was getting very frustrated at how slow the Timemachine backup was. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |